ladbible logo

To make sure you never miss out on your favourite NEW stories, we're happy to send you some reminders

Click 'OK' then 'Allow' to enable notifications

There's A Conspiracy Theory That Louis Tomlinson's Baby Isn't Real

There's A Conspiracy Theory That Louis Tomlinson's Baby Isn't Real

The truth: Exposed.

Mark McGowan

Mark McGowan

Conspiracy theories have dominated the internet for years. Did Courtney Love murder Kurt Cobain? Did Bush do 9/11? Is Tupac really dead? Is Louis Tomlinson's baby fake?

All are debated as much as the last, however, none even come close to the importance of Louis's fake baby.

Louis became father to 'Freddie' (I will use inverted commas for his name as there is not enough evidence to prove his existence) in January of this year. However, the conspiracies against the birth started way before.

It begins on May 12th, when a Twitter account called @BrianaFacts was started. Now, at this point Briana Jungwirth, the mother to 'Freddie', was yet to be known as Louis's girlfriend, or known at all for that matter.

Coincidentally, two days later the pair were pictured together. Who would have cared about a Twitter fan page dedicated to an unknown girl called Briana, prior to that picture? I'll tell you who, Louis's management, who were beginning to spin their web of lies.

Avid Directioners will have seen a clip of Louis catching a doll on stage, and throwing it away saying "oh, it's not real". A hint to the future? Following throwing the doll, he has a smug look that blatantly says 'I'm going to make up a pregnancy for publicity'.

When Louis eventually announced the birth of 'Freddie' on January 23rd, he made what would be considered as the most crucial evidence at this point in the conspiracy.

Hmm. Seems innocent? Is it fuck. Take a look at some of his other tweets.

Does something not seem rather prominent about his exclamation marks? Why are they different on his baby announcement tweet? I'll tell you why. He didn't write the tweet - his management did.

And I shit you not, it gets deeper.

Briana posted a picture of her and the 'newly born' 'Freddie', the date? 1/21/16.

Louis's tweet was posted on the 23rd January, and said that his kid was born 'yesterday'. Those dates don't match. The continuity of the story is flawed.

Many people have dug into the similarities between pictures of other people's babies, and whether the pictures Briana posted were actually of her. But another big lump of evidence came when Louis was first pictured with 'Freddie'.

Posted on his Instagram account, it was a black and white picture among many coloured photos. Why? Because black and white photos are much easier to distort the truth.

And as we know all too well, Louis has a half heart tattoo to the side of his '78' tat. Where is it?

After the second picture, there was another wave of proof. Rapid hair growth, more missing tattoos? WHO THE FUCK ARE YOU TRYING TO FOOL LOUIS!?


A lot of focus has also been on the baby itself. The baby's hands have been in the same position in every photo it's been in. The original thinking behind this being because it's a toy doll.

This suspicion was heightened, nay, confirmed by a picture that Briana posted of 'Freddie's' feet.


You gon' sit there and tell me they real Bri!? Don't play me like that girl.

Why you fronting?

In conclusion, Directioners have found that Briana was a girl drafted in to be the 'mother' of Louis's 'child'. Dates that the two of them announced the pregnancy and birth differed. Every photo of Louis and 'Freddie' is photoshopped. 'Freddie' is a doll.

You can fool millions into buying your music, Louis, but you cannot fool us with this.

H/T: BuzzFeed



Featured Image Credit:

Topics: Conspiracy Theory