ladbible homepage
ladbible homepage
  • Home
  • News
    • UK
    • US
    • World
    • Ireland
    • Australia
    • Science
    • Crime
    • Weather
  • Entertainment
    • Celebrity
    • TV
    • Film
    • Music
    • Gaming
    • Netflix
    • Disney
  • Sport
  • Technology
  • Travel
  • Lifestyle
  • Money
  • Originals
    • FFS PRODUCTIONS
    • Say Maaate to a Mate
    • Daily Ladness
    • UOKM8?
    • FreeToBe
    • Citizen Reef
  • Videos
  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Archive
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
Threads
Snapchat
TikTok
YouTube
Submit Your Content Here
  • GAMINGbible
  • LADbible Group
  • UNILAD
  • SPORTbible
  • Tyla
  • FOODbible
  • UNILAD Tech
Depp Vs Heard Jury Must Answer 42 Questions Before They Reach A Verdict
Home>News
Updated 12:37 1 Jun 2022 GMT+1Published 11:59 1 Jun 2022 GMT+1

Depp Vs Heard Jury Must Answer 42 Questions Before They Reach A Verdict

The jury began deliberations in the case after weeks of testimony

Emily Brown

Emily Brown

google discoverFollow us on Google Discover

The seven jurors tasked with making a decision on Johnny Depp and Amber Heard's defamation case must answer 42 detailed questions before reaching a verdict.

The jury began their deliberations on the case on 27 May following weeks of testimony from witnesses including Depp, who has accused Heard of defaming him in a 2018 op-ed, and Heard, who filed a countersuit after Depp denied her allegations of abuse.

The jury may choose to rule in favour of either Depp or Heard, or of neither, but before making a final decision they must address 24 questions relating to Depp’s case against Heard, and 18 about Heard’s case against Depp.

Both Amber Heard and Johnny Depp gave testimony in the case.
Alamy

Published last week by Fairfax County Court, the 42-question form focuses on whether Depp has proven that he was defamed by Heard's 2018 op-ed, which was published by The Washington Post, and on the amount of compensation that should be paid out should either party win their case.

Most of the questions focus on a series of statements and ask about three legal stipulations that a required to prove if defamation took place; namely if they were published, whether they referred to specific people, and whether their meanings are defamatory.

The first pages of the document relate to Depp’s accusations against Heard and the headline of Heard's op-ed, 'I spoke up against sexual violence — and faced our culture's wrath. That has to change'.

The form asks the jurors if this headline is defamatory, and if so whether the defamation was deliberate by Heard and whether Depp has proved 'actual malice'.

Jurors must answer 42 questions before reaching a verdict.
Fairfax County

Other questions relate to another line from the article, which reads: "Then two years ago, I became a public figure representing domestic abuse, and I felt the full force of our culture’s wrath for women who speak out."

Depp’s legal team has argued that while the actor might not have been named in the article, it can be inferred that Heard was referring to him. Jurors are asked in the questions if it can be proved whether this line is defamatory and why that is the case.

Should the jurors answer 'Yes' to questions about whether Depp has been defamed through the article, he is likely to be awarded damages, of which he has requested $50 million. However, if the jury believes Heard is the one who has been defamed, Depp would lose his case.

The jury must come to a unanimous decision in order to deliver a verdict on the case.

Featured Image Credit: Alamy

Topics: Amber Heard, Johnny Depp, US News, Celebrity

Emily Brown
Emily Brown

Emily Brown is the Community Desk Lead at LADbible Group. Emily first began delivering news when she was just 11 years old - with a paper route. She went on to graduate with a BA Hons in English Language in the Media from Lancaster University before contributing to The Sunday Times Travel Magazine and Student Problems. She joined UNILAD in 2018 to cover breaking news, trending stories and longer form features, and now works as Community Desk Lead to commission and write human interest stories from across the globe.

Recommended reads

Authorities reveal upsetting detail about one of 16 'feral' children saved from ‘house of horrors’Ohio Attorney General Andy WilsonCurly from 2003's Peter Pan is now world-famous actor rumoured to be new James BondUniversal PicturesNew angle shows why England’s goal vs Norway should not have been allowedFoxBritish man, 28, arrested on suspicion of murdering Ann WiddecombeHugh Hastings/Getty Images

Choose your content:

16 mins ago
an hour ago
  • Ohio Attorney General Andy Wilson
    16 mins ago

    Authorities reveal upsetting detail about one of 16 'feral' children saved from ‘house of horrors’

    The case has shocked the US, with investigators continuing to reveal new details about the children's lives

    News
  • Fox
    an hour ago

    New angle shows why England’s goal vs Norway should not have been allowed

    Fresh angle appears to show England's equaliser against Norway should never have stood

    News
  • Hugh Hastings/Getty Images
    an hour ago

    British man, 28, arrested on suspicion of murdering Ann Widdecombe

    Police have issued a major update in their investigation of the murder of Ann Widdecombe

    News
  • Maddie Meyer - FIFA/FIFA via Getty Images
    an hour ago

    New World Cup rule that meant Norway had goal disallowed vs England

    Norway saw a goal disallowed against England in the World Cup quarter-final

    News