• iconNews
  • videos
  • entertainment
  • Home
  • News
    • UK News
    • US News
    • Australia
    • Ireland
    • World News
    • Weird News
    • Viral News
    • Sport
    • Technology
    • Science
    • True Crime
    • Travel
  • Entertainment
    • Celebrity
    • TV & Film
    • Netflix
    • Music
    • Gaming
    • TikTok
  • LAD Originals
    • Say Maaate to a Mate
    • Daily Ladness
    • Lad Files
    • UOKM8?
    • FreeToBe
    • Extinct
    • Citizen Reef
  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • UNILAD
  • SPORTbible
  • GAMINGbible
  • Tyla
  • UNILAD Tech
  • FOODbible
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
Threads
Snapchat
TikTok
YouTube

LAD Entertainment

YouTube

LAD Stories

Submit Your Content
Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone was renamed in the US because Americans don’t know what a philosopher is

Home> News

Updated 17:14 4 Jan 2023 GMTPublished 16:17 4 Jan 2023 GMT

Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone was renamed in the US because Americans don’t know what a philosopher is

J.K. Rowling later regretted the decision

Daisy Phillipson

Daisy Phillipson

When Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone first dropped all the way back in 1997, no one was prepared for the media juggernaut it would go on to become.

But despite the unprecedented reaction, when the time arrived for the book to release in the US of A, they felt it needed a few adjustments.

Advert

Most notably, the title.

British and American Potter Heads alike might not be aware that the name was changed for readers across the pond as the publisher was worried US readers would neither know or care what a philosopher is.

As such, they decided to switch to something more overtly magical in order to get those sales pumping.

This is how Brits will remember the first book.
Malcolm Park/Alamy Stock Photo

Ultimately, they went with Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone.

Advert

Per their official definitions, a philosopher is a 'learned academic' while a sorcerer is a 'wizard', and so you can see how they came to this conclusion.

That being said, Arthur A. Levine - who previously headed Scholastic, which bought the US publishing rights for Harry Potter - wanted to go with a title that was even more on the nose.

Clearly he didn't have much faith in American kids' comprehension skills, as he originally pitched Harry Potter and the School of Magic.

Unsurprisingly, he was quickly shut down by author J.K. Rowling.

Writer Philip W. Errington wrote about this exchange in his Rowling bibliography, stating: "Levine noted that he needed a title that said 'magic' more overtly to American readers.

Advert

Americans got a more on the nose version.
B Christopher/Alamy Stock Photo

"He [Levine] continued, 'I certainly did not mind Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone but I can see... why a book that is titled Philosopher’s Stone might seem more arcane or something.

"So the title that I had suggested to me and which I then turned to Jo was Harry Potter and the School of Magic.

"Jo very thoughtfully said, 'No, that doesn’t feel right to me.'" She went on to say that 'there are objects' she would like before suggesting the Sorcerer’s Stone. And that's exactly what they went with.

One of the key issues with the title is that the Philosopher's Stone is a legit legend, and is the central symbol of the mystical terminology of alchemy.

Advert

The mythic alchemical substance is said to be capable of turning base metals such as mercury into gold or silver.

In the Middle Ages, people believed the Philosopher's Stone was an elixir that held the key to eternal life.

The Sorcerer’s Stone, on the other hand, is just made up.

As such, Rowling later admitted that she regretted the title change while speaking for BBC Red Nose Day back in 2001 - but by that point it was too late.

Advert

"They changed the first title, but with my consent," she said. "To be honest, I wish I hadn't agreed now, but it was my first book, and I was so grateful that anyone was publishing me I wanted to keep them happy."

Featured Image Credit: Warner Bros.

Topics: Harry Potter, JK Rowling, US News, UK News, Books

Daisy Phillipson
Daisy Phillipson

Daisy graduated from Kingston University with a degree in Magazine Journalism, writing a thesis on the move from print to digital publishing. Continuing this theme, she has written for a range of online publications including Digital Spy and Little White Lies, with a particular passion for TV and film. Contact her on [email protected]

X

@DaisyWebb77

Advert

Advert

Advert

Choose your content:

4 hours ago
5 hours ago
  • 4 hours ago

    World's 'first flying car' is going on sale much sooner than you think

    Flying cars are still something for the future, but apparently the rapidly approaching future

    News
  • 4 hours ago

    Experts issued warning over certain tattoo colour that could increase risk of deadly disease

    There can be some long-term health risks to going under the tattoo needle

    News
  • 4 hours ago

    Man who didn't sleep for a record 264 hours suffered from horrendous and potentially deadly side effects

    He smashed the record but suffered dangerous side effects in the process

    News
  • 5 hours ago

    The targets Iran could strike as it issues chilling threat to UK amid ongoing conflict

    The world isn't feeling particularly safe right now

    News
  • Timeline of JK Rowling's rows with Harry Potter actors as author issues fresh dig at Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, and Rupert Grint
  • JK Rowling Mentioned Just 10 Times In Harry Potter Special
  • New Harry Potter TV series closing in on deal
  • J.K. Rowling explained why she could never kill off Hagrid in Harry Potter