• iconNews
  • videos
  • entertainment
  • Home
  • News
    • UK News
    • US News
    • Australia
    • Ireland
    • World News
    • Weird News
    • Viral News
    • Sport
    • Technology
    • Science
    • True Crime
    • Travel
  • Entertainment
    • Celebrity
    • TV & Film
    • Netflix
    • Music
    • Gaming
    • TikTok
  • LAD Originals
    • Say Maaate to a Mate
    • Daily Ladness
    • Lad Files
    • UOKM8?
    • FreeToBe
    • Extinct
    • Citizen Reef
  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • UNILAD
  • SPORTbible
  • GAMINGbible
  • Tyla
  • UNILAD Tech
  • FOODbible
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
Threads
Snapchat
TikTok
YouTube

LAD Entertainment

YouTube

LAD Stories

Submit Your Content
Archaeologists discover oldest ever human footprints from 115,000 years ago and they shouldn't be there

Home> News> World News

Published 21:02 3 Jan 2025 GMT

Archaeologists discover oldest ever human footprints from 115,000 years ago and they shouldn't be there

The seven footprints could rewrite history as we know it

Michael Slavin

Michael Slavin

Archaeologists have discovered the oldest ever human footprints, dating back a whopping 115,000 years, and worryingly, they shouldn’t even be there.

Scientists uncovered the footprints in northern Saudi Arabia at a location fittingly nicknamed ‘the trace’ in Arabic.

Seven footprints were found by archaeologists who uncovered the site of a muddy lakebed, and they were found amidst the prints of hundreds of prehistoric animals.

Advert

The site was found deep within the Nefud Desert in 2017 following over 100,000 years of weather finally wiping the sediment on top away.

While they said they cannot ‘completely exclude’ Neanderthals as the potential authors of the footprints, the authors of the paper written on the findings said it is ‘unlikely’.

The footprints in question (Stewart et al./Science Advances)
The footprints in question (Stewart et al./Science Advances)

Matthew Stewart, the lead author and a biologist at the Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, said in a statement: “It is only after the last interglacial with the return of cooler conditions that we have definitive evidence for Neanderthals moving into the region.

“The footprints, therefore, most likely represent humans, or Homo sapiens.”

Advert

As civilisations migrate from place to place they leave footprints behind, and often these become covered over.

Modern human footprints lose their fine details in mud flats within two days, and their prints are made completely unrecognisable within four.

This was found by an experimental study, and ‘similar observations’ have been made in the tracks of other non-hominin mammal tracks.

The footprints were found surrounding what would’ve been a lake, with their prints surrounded by those of non-predator animals.

In essence, the early stage humans were looking for somewhere to drink, and stopped around a lake.

Advert

The scientists ended up concluding though that they didn’t stay for long.

The footprints were all left surrounding a lake (Stewart et al./Science Advances)
The footprints were all left surrounding a lake (Stewart et al./Science Advances)

They said: “The lack of archaeological evidence suggests that the Alathar lake was only briefly visited by people.

“These findings indicate that transient lakeshore use by humans during a dry period of the last interglacial was likely primarily tied to the need for potable water.”

According to this, the tracks were probably the last ones laid down by humans in the area prior to an impending ice age.

Advert

This may have played a part in the tracks not being walked over by other groups before another layer of sediment fell on it.

This finding by scientists is the latest in a long line of pre-historic footprints of homosapiens.

One particularly notable one was called Eve’s footprint, due to the fact it was deemed to be a female human foot – the print of which was left around 117,000 years ago.

Due to the range of when it may have taken place however, the footprints in Saudi Arabia may be even older than this, and could be as old as 130,000 years old.

Featured Image Credit: Stewart et al./Science Advances

Topics: Saudi Arabia

Michael Slavin
Michael Slavin

Michael Slavin is LADbible's dedicated specialist Film and TV writer. Following his completion of a Masters in International Journalism at Salford University, he began working for the Warrington Guardian as a reporter. Throughout this he did freelance work about Entertainment for publications such as DiscussingFilm, where he was the Film and TV editor. Now, he is LAD's go to voice on all things Netflix, True Crime, and UK TV, as well as interviewing huge global stars such as Jake Gyllenhaal, Daisy Ridley, and Ben Stiller.

X

@michaelslavin98

Advert

Advert

Advert

  • First-ever £3 billion 'tomb' that's 1,500ft underground will be sealed off from humans for 100,000 years
  • Scientists discover remains of ‘buried ancient planet’ from 4.5 billion years ago

Choose your content:

12 hours ago
13 hours ago
  • 12 hours ago

    Terrifying GoPro footage shows moment great white shark 'nearly eats' diver

    It just swam into view while he was diving

    News
  • 12 hours ago

    Scientists have absolutely no idea what 'impossible' radio signals coming from deep inside Antarctica are

    "We still don't actually have an explanation for what those anomalies are"

    News
  • 13 hours ago

    Conspiracy theory sparked after China posts video of astronauts in space

    One small glass for man, one giant conspiracy theory for mankind

    News
  • 13 hours ago

    Scientists left stunned after discovering man was living normal life with 90% of his brain missing

    I'm often accused of not having a brain, but this is next level

    News