ladbible homepage
ladbible homepage
  • Home
  • News
    • UK
    • US
    • World
    • Ireland
    • Australia
    • Science
    • Crime
    • Weather
  • Entertainment
    • Celebrity
    • TV
    • Film
    • Music
    • Gaming
    • Netflix
    • Disney
  • Sport
  • Technology
  • Travel
  • Lifestyle
  • Money
  • Originals
    • FFS PRODUCTIONS
    • Say Maaate to a Mate
    • Daily Ladness
    • UOKM8?
    • FreeToBe
    • Citizen Reef
  • Videos
  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Archive
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
Threads
Snapchat
TikTok
YouTube
Submit Your Content Here
  • GAMINGbible
  • LADbible Group
  • UNILAD
  • SPORTbible
  • Tyla
  • FOODbible
  • UNILAD Tech
Experts warn artificial sweeteners should not be assumed to be safe
Home>News
Published 12:02 28 Aug 2022 GMT+1

Experts warn artificial sweeteners should not be assumed to be safe

The test subjects were given aspartame, stevia, saccharin and sucralose

Shiala Mahmood

Shiala Mahmood

google discoverFollow us on Google Discover

Experts are warning that artificial sweeteners used in diet sodas and low-fat desserts should 'not be assumed to be safe'.

Researchers from the Weizmann Institute of Science near Tel Aviv, Israel, and John Hopkins University in Maryland, US, conducted a study where they gave 120 people artificial sweeteners up to three times a week for 14 days.

Alamy

The dose of each supplement did not exceed the 50 milligrams per kilo of body weight recommended by the Food and drug Administration (FDA).

Advert

The study found that those who were given aspartame and stevia had an altered gut microbiome. Aspartame and stevia are typically found in diet sodas and juices.

Meanwhile, those who were given saccharin and sucralose where less able to absorb sugar. Saccharin and sucralose are sugars substitutes often used for baking.

To monitor blood sugar levels, each participant wore a glucose monitor for the duration of the trial. Glucose tolerance tests were regularly administered.

Stool samples were also taken from each participant and implanted into mice who had no gut microbiome.

The results showed that those who were given saccharine and sucralose had problems absorbing sugar, while all four sweeteners showed changes to the gut microbiome.

Dr. Eran Elinav, who led the study, said: "Our trial has shown that non-nutritive sweeteners may impair glucose responses by altering our microbiome."

Alamy

Dr Elinav added: "In my opinion as a physician, once it has been noted that non-nutritive sweeteners are not inert to the human body, the burden of proof of demonstrating or refuting their potential impacts on human health is at the responsibility of those promoting their use and we should not assume they are safe until proven otherwise. Until then, caution is advised."

Dr Elinav also said a long-term study would need to be conducted to determine whether sweeteners raise the risk of diabetes.

However, the immunologist explained that consuming sugars is a 'well-proven health risk for obesity, diabetes and their health implications'.

All four of the sweeteners used in the study have been approved for consumption by the FDA. However, stevia which is often found in diet soda drinks are not as closely monitored by the FDA because it is classed as 'generally recognised as safe' (GRAS).

According to the FDA, Food additives and GRAS both must be determined by scientists to meet 'the safety standard of reasonable certainty of no harm under the intended conditions of its use'.

Food additives must undergo a premarket reviews and be approved by the FDA. However, GRAs substances do not require premarket approval, which means that companies can decide whether or not to use them without being required to notify the FDA.

Earlier this year the World Health Organisation launched a public consultation to determine the health effects of sweeteners.

The meta-analysis of studies concluded: "Results from prospective cohort studies suggest the possibility of long-term harm in the form of increased risk of obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases and mortality. Further research is needed to determine whether the observed associations are genuine, or a result of study design."




Featured Image Credit: Dorling Kindersley ltd / Alamy Stock Photo Yon Marsh / Alamy Stock Photo

Topics: Science

Shiala Mahmood
Shiala Mahmood

Recommended reads

Kim Kardashian criticised after fans spot her 'stealing' Monaco Grand Prix winner's towelX/@EstagiariodaF1Hiker thought he was 'going to die' after grizzly bear dragged him 20ft in terrifying attackGoFundMeAriana Grande and Ethan Slater 'split' after almost three years together(Michael Buckner/Variety via Getty Images)Hulk Hogan's daughter Brooke hits out at police after investigation into WWE star's death concludesHal Horowitz/WireImage

Advert

Choose your content:

4 hours ago
13 hours ago
15 hours ago
  • GoFundMe
    4 hours ago

    Hiker thought he was 'going to die' after grizzly bear dragged him 20ft in terrifying attack

    The 32-year-old was left with severe injuries after being mauled by a grizzly bear during a hike

    News
  • David Rogers/Getty Images
    13 hours ago

    England and Scotland fans given World Cup pub boost but 42-year-old drinking ban remains

    Both nations head there for group games, and their fans will want to drink

    News
  • (Instagram/@athos_salome)
    15 hours ago

    Living Nostradamus makes prediction for who will win World Cup

    There may be some hope for England fans after all...

    News
  • Getty Stock Photo
    15 hours ago

    Ring doorbell rule users may not be aware of that can cost thousands if broken

    Looking out at the space in front of your door is alright, if the camera sees further then it's less sp

    News
  • Experts say prostate cancer screening should not be offered to most men in the UK
  • All of these food items will get more expensive when Super El Nino hits, experts warn
  • Experts warn 'space junk' likely to collide with aircraft sometime this year
  • Average UK household will be £480 worse off this year, experts warn