• iconNews
  • videos
  • entertainment
  • Home
  • News
    • UK News
    • US News
    • Australia
    • Ireland
    • World News
    • Weird News
    • Viral News
    • Sport
    • Technology
    • Science
    • True Crime
    • Travel
  • Entertainment
    • Celebrity
    • TV & Film
    • Netflix
    • Music
    • Gaming
    • TikTok
  • LAD Originals
    • FFS PRODUCTIONS
    • Say Maaate to a Mate
    • Daily Ladness
    • UOKM8?
    • FreeToBe
    • Citizen Reef
  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • UNILAD
  • SPORTbible
  • GAMINGbible
  • Tyla
  • UNILAD Tech
  • FOODbible
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
Threads
Snapchat
TikTok
YouTube

LAD Entertainment

YouTube

LAD Stories

Submit Your Content
Experts warn artificial sweeteners should not be assumed to be safe

Home> News

Published 12:02 28 Aug 2022 GMT+1

Experts warn artificial sweeteners should not be assumed to be safe

The test subjects were given aspartame, stevia, saccharin and sucralose

Shiala Mahmood

Shiala Mahmood

Experts are warning that artificial sweeteners used in diet sodas and low-fat desserts should 'not be assumed to be safe'.

Researchers from the Weizmann Institute of Science near Tel Aviv, Israel, and John Hopkins University in Maryland, US, conducted a study where they gave 120 people artificial sweeteners up to three times a week for 14 days.

Alamy

The dose of each supplement did not exceed the 50 milligrams per kilo of body weight recommended by the Food and drug Administration (FDA).

Advert

The study found that those who were given aspartame and stevia had an altered gut microbiome. Aspartame and stevia are typically found in diet sodas and juices.

Meanwhile, those who were given saccharin and sucralose where less able to absorb sugar. Saccharin and sucralose are sugars substitutes often used for baking.

To monitor blood sugar levels, each participant wore a glucose monitor for the duration of the trial. Glucose tolerance tests were regularly administered.

Stool samples were also taken from each participant and implanted into mice who had no gut microbiome.

The results showed that those who were given saccharine and sucralose had problems absorbing sugar, while all four sweeteners showed changes to the gut microbiome.

Advert

Dr. Eran Elinav, who led the study, said: "Our trial has shown that non-nutritive sweeteners may impair glucose responses by altering our microbiome."

Alamy

Dr Elinav added: "In my opinion as a physician, once it has been noted that non-nutritive sweeteners are not inert to the human body, the burden of proof of demonstrating or refuting their potential impacts on human health is at the responsibility of those promoting their use and we should not assume they are safe until proven otherwise. Until then, caution is advised."

Dr Elinav also said a long-term study would need to be conducted to determine whether sweeteners raise the risk of diabetes.

However, the immunologist explained that consuming sugars is a 'well-proven health risk for obesity, diabetes and their health implications'.

Advert

All four of the sweeteners used in the study have been approved for consumption by the FDA. However, stevia which is often found in diet soda drinks are not as closely monitored by the FDA because it is classed as 'generally recognised as safe' (GRAS).

According to the FDA, Food additives and GRAS both must be determined by scientists to meet 'the safety standard of reasonable certainty of no harm under the intended conditions of its use'.

Food additives must undergo a premarket reviews and be approved by the FDA. However, GRAs substances do not require premarket approval, which means that companies can decide whether or not to use them without being required to notify the FDA.

Earlier this year the World Health Organisation launched a public consultation to determine the health effects of sweeteners.

The meta-analysis of studies concluded: "Results from prospective cohort studies suggest the possibility of long-term harm in the form of increased risk of obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases and mortality. Further research is needed to determine whether the observed associations are genuine, or a result of study design."

Advert




Featured Image Credit: Dorling Kindersley ltd / Alamy Stock Photo Yon Marsh / Alamy Stock Photo

Topics: Science

Shiala Mahmood
Shiala Mahmood

Advert

Advert

Advert

Choose your content:

10 hours ago
12 hours ago
14 hours ago
15 hours ago
  • Getty Stock Images
    10 hours ago

    Scientists demand a ban on supermarket bacon after chemical used linked to 50,000 cancer cases

    Cancer Research UK say 'many studies have shown that eating lots of red and processed meat increases the risk of bowel cancer'

    News
  • Alex Slitz/Getty Images
    12 hours ago

    Basketball star Kevin Durant gets insane return after finding Bitcoin wallet from over a decade ago

    Kevin Durant's business partner said 'a user error' stopped him getting access to his Bitcoin wallet

    News
  • Getty Images
    14 hours ago

    Reality of drinking raw eggs as viral trend explained

    The varying ways of how people like their eggs in the morning has caused quite the debate online

    News
  • Allison Robbert/Bloomberg via Getty Images
    15 hours ago

    Donald Trump could exploit loophole law to be re-elected for third term

    Steve Bannon, Trump's Chief Strategist during his first presidential tenure, thinks he is 'going to get a third term'

    News
  • Experts warn Brits about 20 passwords they should not be using in 2024
  • Heart surgeon dispels myths about creatine and explains when it's not safe to take
  • Experts warn that lunchtime favourite food is 'colossal' risk to health and could leave you seriously ill
  • There are ten types of food that experts warn you should never cook in an air fryer