• iconNews
  • videos
  • entertainment
  • Home
  • News
    • UK News
    • US News
    • Australia
    • Ireland
    • World News
    • Weird News
    • Viral News
    • Sport
    • Technology
    • Science
    • True Crime
    • Travel
  • Entertainment
    • Celebrity
    • TV & Film
    • Netflix
    • Music
    • Gaming
    • TikTok
  • LAD Originals
    • Say Maaate to a Mate
    • Daily Ladness
    • Lad Files
    • UOKM8?
    • FreeToBe
    • Extinct
    • Citizen Reef
  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • UNILAD
  • SPORTbible
  • GAMINGbible
  • Tyla
  • UNILAD Tech
  • FOODbible
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
Threads
Snapchat
TikTok
YouTube

LAD Entertainment

YouTube

LAD Stories

Submit Your Content
Dark psychological prison experiment was shut down after subjects were left traumatised from their friends

Home> News> Crime

Published 08:29 23 Sep 2024 GMT+1

Dark psychological prison experiment was shut down after subjects were left traumatised from their friends

The controversial Stanford Prison Experiment was conducted in 1971 by psychologist Philip Zimbardo

Anish Vij

Anish Vij

A dark psychological study was shut down early after the subjects were left traumatised.

The 1971 Stanford Prison Experiment was conduced by psychologist Philip Zimbardo, who wanted to explore what would happen when individuals were placed in positions of power within a simulated prison environment.

The study was set up in the basement of Stanford University’s psychology department, where 24 male college students were assigned to the roles of either prisoners or guards.

Zimbardo himself acted as the prison superintendent.

Advert

In total, the experiment was supposed to last two weeks, but Zimbardo was forced to terminate it after just six days.

It turns out that those who were assigned as guards displayed extreme and pretty disturbing behaviour.

A prisoner and guard in the Stanford Prison Experiment (Duke Downey/San Francisco Chronicle via Getty Images)
A prisoner and guard in the Stanford Prison Experiment (Duke Downey/San Francisco Chronicle via Getty Images)

The guards used abusive techniques and punishments, such as forcing prisoners to perform dehumanising tasks, all while restricting their access to basic needs like food and sleep.

On the second day, the prisoners staged a rebellion and within the first four days, three of them had to be released earlier after the experiment took a toll on their mental wellbeing.

Advert

Zimbardo later claimed that the 'social forces and environmental contingencies' meant that the guards behaved badly.

Simply Psychology reports that Zimbardo wrote: "Most of the participants said they had felt involved and committed.

"The research had felt 'real' to them. One guard said: 'I was surprised at myself.

"'I made them call each other names and clean the toilets out with their bare hands. I practically considered the prisoners cattle and I kept thinking I had to watch out for them in case they tried something.'

Philip Zimbardo helmed the Stanford Prison Experiment (Duke Downey/San Francisco Chronicle via Getty Images)
Philip Zimbardo helmed the Stanford Prison Experiment (Duke Downey/San Francisco Chronicle via Getty Images)

Advert

"Another guard said: 'Acting authoritatively can be fun. Power can be a great pleasure'.

"And another: '… during the inspection I went to Cell Two to mess up a bed which a prisoner had just made and he grabbed me, screaming that he had just made it and that he was not going to let me mess it up'.

"'He grabbed me by the throat and although he was laughing I was pretty scared.

"'I lashed out with my stick and hit him on the chin although not very hard, and when I freed myself I became angry'."

Douglas Korpi, who served as inmate 8612 in the Stanford Prison Experiment, became a prison psychologist after the study.

Advert

He said: "The Stanford Prison Experiment was a very benign prison situation and it promotes everything a normal prison promotes — the guard role promotes sadism, the prisoner role promotes confusion and shame."

The whole thing was made into a film The Stanford Prison Experiment in 2015, with Zimbardo’s active participation.

Featured Image Credit: prisonexp.org

Topics: Crime, Education, US News

Anish Vij
Anish Vij

Anish is a Journalist at LADbible Group and is a GG2 Young Journalist of the Year 2025. He has a Master's degree in Multimedia Journalism and a Bachelor's degree in International Business Management. Apart from that, his life revolves around the ‘Four F’s’ - family, friends, football and food. Email: [email protected]

X

@Anish_Vij

Advert

Advert

Advert

Choose your content:

8 hours ago
10 hours ago
12 hours ago
  • Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images
    8 hours ago

    Body language expert explains why King Charles was 'clearly uneasy' after what Trump did during state visit

    Trump was breaking royal protocol once again

    News
  • Nina Westervelt/Billboard via Getty Images
    8 hours ago

    Major new discovery in case of decomposing body found in boot of singer's impounded Tesla

    The Tesla was registered to singer D4vd, real name David Anthony Burke

    News
  • Handout/Getty Images
    10 hours ago

    Disturbing behaviours Madeleine McCann prime suspect Christian B displayed before arrest

    Christian Brueckner's claimed McCann was 'dead' among other odd behaviours in the ITV documentary

    News
  • Jonathan Brady - WPA Pool/Getty Images
    12 hours ago

    Royal protocol explained as Donald Trump breaks major etiquette in first moments of meeting with King Charles

    The US president is currently in Britain on a second state visit, with plans to meet Sir Keir Starmer tomorrow

    News
  • Charlie Kirk shooting 'will haunt security team for rest of their lives' after key mistakes, says expert
  • Jeffrey Epstein’s victims compiling their own client list as they say 'we know all the names'
  • Boyfriend of Ukrainian refugee who was stabbed to death on train blasts judge for letting suspect free
  • Controversial experiment involving 22 orphaned children saw them get £730,000 compensation years later