Logan Paul Says If People Knew Who Lana Rhoades' Baby Daddy Was "That F*****g Kid Ain't Getting Bullied"

Logan Paul has said that if people knew who Lana Rhoades’ baby daddy was, then “that f*****g kid ain’t getting bullied”. 

The YouTuber-turned-boxer made the remarks on a recent episode of his and Mike Majlak’s YouTube podcast, Impaulsive, after Majlak explained that “little kids on TikTok” were speculating that Rhoades’ baby could be his, and therefore “he’s gonna get bullied in high school”. 

Majlak, 37, told listeners on the platform in their 310th episode: “Not only did I turn 37, but our good friend Lana Rhoades had a child.”

“I’ve been spending the last 8 plus months explaining to everyone calmly, ‘that’s not my child’, had an understanding that it was gonna come out looking a little bit differently than I look, let’s just leave it at that.” 

He continued: “Thing came out looking as pure as driven snow, like a macadamia nut, and I’m driven right back into the f******g fold again. All the little kids on Tiktok [saying], ‘it might be Mike Majlak’s kid, he’s gonna get bullied in high school’. They’re making videos again, I got dragged right back into this s***.”

Paul then told his co-host and his listeners: “Let me tell you something, if they knew who that kid’s dad was, let me tell you something, that f*****g kid ain’t getting bullied.”

“Exactly,” said Majlak, before joking about the lavish lifestyle the baby will soon embark on.

“He’s gonna be in private schools, flying on private jets, watching private screenings of movies and s***. He’s just a private type of kid,” Majlak said. 

“Well listen dude, it’s a beautiful, healthy baby boy. It’s what we hoped and honestly the girl is glowing. She said it feels like, Jeff you probably relate to this,” Majlak said, signalling to Jeff Wittek, “it feels like it’s Christmas morning every single day, that’s what she said.”

With hilarious comedic timing, Wittek added: “I’m Jewish, so I don’t know what that feels like.”

You can watch the Impaulsive podcast here: