Advert

Everything We Know About Dinosaurs Has Been Proven Wrong

Published 
| Last updated 

Everything We Know About Dinosaurs Has Been Proven Wrong

Jurassic Park, Godzilla, and David Attenborough - possibly the first three things that spring to mind when we think of dinosaurs. (I'm referring to David Attenborough's documentaries here and not his age).

We love a good dinosaur, some of us even go so far as to impersonate them given a chance...

Credit: LADbible

Advert

But in a new article, PhD student Matthew Baron (from the University of Cambridge) has rubbished a lot of the things we took for granted. He's spent three years scanning fossils and comparing their anatomic features - he's clearly, a full-time student with that much time on his hands.

Up to this point, identifying a dinosaur came down to the hip bones. **Warning technical terms follow**

Ornithischia (bird-hipped), dinosaurs are separated from Saurischia (lizard-hipped). This was decided back in the 1880s but has been used ever since.

There are over 1,000 known species currently, all ranging from 200 million years old to a more youthful 66 million.

Advert

Baron's computer analysis looked at far more anatomic features and completely reorded the family tree of dinosaurs.

It looked at 457 diagnostic anatomical features, analysed 32 billion trees and came up with the best possible arrangement... all in five minutes.

Advert

There's still plenty of research to be done, but critics are praising Baron for his dedication and works.

Credit: Matthew Baron

Kevin Padian, a dinosaur expert at the University of California, told the New York Times it will be "interesting" how this is received given the "original and provocative reassessment of dinosaur origins and relationships."

Advert

"It's a radical proposal," he said. "No one expects it will be the last word."

Velociraptors are now on their complete own branch of the dinosaur family tree. It's been called Therapoda and it's likely these flying dinosaurs spread from Scotland instead of South America. McVelociraptor?

And, the dinsoaurs' ancestor? Humans... but a little more dinosaur-ish.

The New York Times wrote: "Based on his tree, Mr Baron believes that the original dinosaurs were small, two-footed animals with large grasping hands, as others have said before, but also omnivorous. Early dinosaurs had both knifelike teeth for eating meat and flatter teeth for chewing plants."

Advert

The question arising from this... Why didn't dinosaurs evolve like humans? Or, why didn't humans evolve like dinosaurs? A proper beard-scratcher...

Featured Image Credit: PA

Topics: Science, Dinosaur, Jurassic Park, Research

Michael Minay
Advert
Advert
Advert

Chosen for YouChosen for You

News

Dominic Cummings Releases WhatsApp Messages Appearing To Show Boris Johnson Calling Matt Hancock 'Hopeless'

21 hours ago

Most Read StoriesMost Read

News

Ex-Adult Film Star Lana Rhoades Wants All Her Videos Deleted

14 hours ago