
There is a sinister undertone to a character who was voted as one of the scariest in children's films - the Child Catcher.
Plenty of children's films and TV shows of yesteryear have not aged particularly well, whether it's because of their content being offensive, or because they were just straight up terrifying.
For example, anyone who watched Watership Down expecting a nice film about bunny rabbits, only to be met with a harrowing story about a struggle for survival featuring rabbits being entombed by construction workers and randomly carried off by hawks, can attest to that.
But one film which really does show just how disturbing children's films could be is Chitty Chitty Bang Bang, more specifically the Child Catcher.
Advert
This is a character who abducts children from the streets, luring them into his carriage with promises of sweets and lollipops, only to reveal that it is in fact a cage before driving away with the children screaming for help inside.
The Child Catcher was played by Sir Robert Helpman, a ballet dancer by training, who died 40 years ago on 28 September. His training in ballet allowed him to move with an eerie light-footedness which made the character seem so creepy as he skulked and tiptoed around.

To a modern viewer there are pretty strong overtones of predation in the way that the character approaches the children, telling them 'come along, kiddie-winkies! Here we are children, come and get your lollipops, lollipops, come along my little ones' as he lures them in, his tone making your skin crawl.
There's also the particualrly disturbing way that the adults around them seemingly do very little to actually help the children either, aside from a couple of half-hearted appeals to be careful.
The character was not included in the original book by Ian Fleming, yes Ian Fleming who wrote James Bond, from which the 1968 film was adapted, and it is believed that the character is an addition by the film's writer, none other than Roald Dahl, though the film's director Ken Hughes has also claimed that he wrote the character.
While the Child Catcher is clearly disturbing as a characterisation of child predation, there is also a deeper interpretation of the character which takes it to another sinister place.

This is that the character is representative of certain antisemitic tropes, and Dahl's own open antisemitic views have been interpreted as further evidence of this, with the author having told The New Statesman: “There is a trait in the Jewish character that does provoke animosity. I mean, there’s always a reason why anti-anything crops up anywhere; even a stinker like Hitler didn’t just pick on them for no reason.”
The Child Catcher is also depicted with a large prosthetic nose, a common antisemitic trope in offensive depictions of Jewish people, as well as wearing a top hat, which also often features in such depictions.
Another element of this is the Blood Libel - the historic antisemitic myth that Jews would abduct Christian children for blood sacrifice in religious rituals, which first appeared in England in the 12th century and spread through Europe.
Taking these things together, it's not difficult to see why a character with a large prosthetic nose who abducts children was seen as offensive.
Academic Golan Moskowitz even published a paper analysing this in Jewish Film & New Media journal in 2023 in which Moskowitz highlighted how the Child Catcher can be read as an antisemitic trope.
Topics: Film, Entertainment, News