• iconNews
  • videos
  • entertainment
  • Home
  • News
    • UK News
    • US News
    • Australia
    • Ireland
    • World News
    • Weird News
    • Viral News
    • Sport
    • Technology
    • Science
    • True Crime
    • Travel
  • Entertainment
    • Celebrity
    • TV & Film
    • Netflix
    • Music
    • Gaming
    • TikTok
  • LAD Originals
    • Say Maaate to a Mate
    • Daily Ladness
    • Lad Files
    • UOKM8?
    • FreeToBe
    • Extinct
    • Citizen Reef
  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • UNILAD
  • SPORTbible
  • GAMINGbible
  • Tyla
  • UNILAD Tech
  • FOODbible
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
Threads
Snapchat
TikTok
YouTube

LAD Entertainment

YouTube

LAD Stories

Submit Your Content
Why new 28 Days Later sequel is 28 Years Later rather than Months

Home> Entertainment> Film

Updated 09:40 11 Dec 2024 GMTPublished 17:56 10 Dec 2024 GMT

Why new 28 Days Later sequel is 28 Years Later rather than Months

The sequel is coming, but skipped a stage

Michael Slavin

Michael Slavin

Featured Image Credit: 20th Century Studios / Sony

Topics: 28 Years Later, Cillian Murphy, TV and Film, Film

Michael Slavin
Michael Slavin

Michael Slavin is LADbible's dedicated specialist Film and TV writer. Following his completion of a Masters in International Journalism at Salford University, he began working for the Warrington Guardian as a reporter. Throughout this he did freelance work about Entertainment for publications such as DiscussingFilm, where he was the Film and TV editor. Now, he is LAD's go to voice on all things Netflix, True Crime, and UK TV, as well as interviewing huge global stars such as Jake Gyllenhaal, Daisy Ridley, and Ben Stiller.

X

@michaelslavin98

Advert

Advert

Advert

When this morning’s 28 Years Later trailer was released, today was the first time many would have realised a sequel is even in the works.

If that’s the case, you may be wondering whether you missed an instalment in the series.

We had the 2002 28 Days Later starring Cillian Murphy, we had 28 Weeks Later starring Jeremy Renner in 2007, and now we are going straight to 28 Years later starring Aaron Taylor Johnson, Jodie Comer, Ralph Fiennes, and Jack O’Connell.

The creators of the original film, writer Alex Garland and director Danny Boyle, have spoken over the years about a possible sequel.

Advert

At one point, Garland actually sat on the side of believing they should do months later as the next instalment in the franchise.

He said in a 2015 interview with IGN: “Danny [Boyle] and [producer] Andrew [Macdonald] and I have been having quite serious conversations about it so it is a possibility.

“It’s complicated. There’s a whole bunch of reasons why it’s complicated, which are boring so I won’t go into, but there’s a possibility. It’s more likely to be 28 Months than 28 Years. 28 Years gives you one more place to go. 28 Decades is probably taking the p*ss.”

Cillian Murphy is set to return, this time as a zombie seemingly (Sony)
Cillian Murphy is set to return, this time as a zombie seemingly (Sony)

Garland and Boyle did not return for 28 Weeks Later and, while it was better than you’d generally expect for a sequel to a classic film where no one from the original is returning, it was not as well reviewed.

Advert

28 Days Later sits at 87% on Rotten Tomatoes with a 7.5 on IMDb, while 28 Weeks Later sits on 72%, with a 6.9 on IMDb.

Years later, in 2023, Inverse spoke to Garland, Boyle, and several others to create an Oral History of 28 Days Later.

Garland said regarding a potential sequel at the time: “I resisted it for a long time because there were things about 28 Weeks that bugged me. I just thought, “F*ck that. I’d rather try to write a different story in a different world.

“But a few years ago an idea materialized in my head for what would be really 28 Years Later. Danny always liked the idea.”

Alex Garland and Danny Boyle (Michael Putland via Getty Images)
Alex Garland and Danny Boyle (Michael Putland via Getty Images)

Advert

At the time, Boyle said: “We’re talking about it quite seriously, quite diligently. If he doesn’t want to direct it himself I’ll be well up for it, if we can execute a similarly good idea.”

The change appears to be due to the fact that the idea Garland hand hinges specifically around there having been years for the virus to evolve and change, and to distance from 28 Weeks Later.

They also appear to have solved the issue of a follow up only having one place to go and it taking the p*ss, with two sequels set to come following 2025’s 28 Years Later.

With the first of the three new films directed by a returning Danny Boyle, they were filmed back to back with 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple, with Candyman director Nia DaCosta set to helm the film.

Choose your content:

18 hours ago
20 hours ago
23 hours ago
  • 18 hours ago

    Netflix users have just weeks to watch highest rated Rotten Tomatoes movie ever before it’s removed

    The 2018 thriller-drama film has a perfect score from critics and viewers don't have much time left to watch it

    Entertainment
  • 20 hours ago

    Man throws up after being told he has to let partner sleep with another man

    Apparently, we're in the era of baffling sex shows on TV

    Entertainment
  • 20 hours ago

    Michael Cera’s mum left Superbad set ‘pretty quickly’ after seeing scene he was filming

    The Superbad cast came together to talk about their awkward scenes

    Entertainment
  • 23 hours ago

    Why it took David Beckham so long to receive knighthood as he finally gets honour

    The former England captain has had two notable scandals, which could have stopped his knighthood

    Entertainment
  • Eight ways to ring in the festive season with your mates
  • Original ending to 28 Days Later had tragic ending for Cillian Murphy’s character as he returns in trailer for sequel
  • Fans stunned as Cillian Murphy returns as zombie in first 28 Years Later trailer
  • New 28 Days later sequel with Aaron Taylor Johnson was 'filmed entirely on an iPhone' despite huge budget