• iconNews
  • videos
  • entertainment
  • Home
  • News
    • UK News
    • US News
    • Australia
    • Ireland
    • World News
    • Weird News
    • Viral News
    • Sport
    • Technology
    • Science
    • True Crime
    • Travel
  • Entertainment
    • Celebrity
    • TV & Film
    • Netflix
    • Music
    • Gaming
    • TikTok
  • LAD Originals
    • Say Maaate to a Mate
    • Daily Ladness
    • Lad Files
    • UOKM8?
    • FreeToBe
    • Extinct
    • Citizen Reef
  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • UNILAD
  • SPORTbible
  • GAMINGbible
  • Tyla
  • UNILAD Tech
  • FOODbible
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
Threads
Snapchat
TikTok
YouTube

LAD Entertainment

YouTube

LAD Stories

Submit Your Content
Experts warn artificial sweeteners should not be assumed to be safe

Home> News

Published 12:02 28 Aug 2022 GMT+1

Experts warn artificial sweeteners should not be assumed to be safe

The test subjects were given aspartame, stevia, saccharin and sucralose

Shiala Mahmood

Shiala Mahmood

Experts are warning that artificial sweeteners used in diet sodas and low-fat desserts should 'not be assumed to be safe'.

Researchers from the Weizmann Institute of Science near Tel Aviv, Israel, and John Hopkins University in Maryland, US, conducted a study where they gave 120 people artificial sweeteners up to three times a week for 14 days.

Alamy

Advert

The dose of each supplement did not exceed the 50 milligrams per kilo of body weight recommended by the Food and drug Administration (FDA).

The study found that those who were given aspartame and stevia had an altered gut microbiome. Aspartame and stevia are typically found in diet sodas and juices.

Meanwhile, those who were given saccharin and sucralose where less able to absorb sugar. Saccharin and sucralose are sugars substitutes often used for baking.

To monitor blood sugar levels, each participant wore a glucose monitor for the duration of the trial. Glucose tolerance tests were regularly administered.

Stool samples were also taken from each participant and implanted into mice who had no gut microbiome.

Advert

The results showed that those who were given saccharine and sucralose had problems absorbing sugar, while all four sweeteners showed changes to the gut microbiome.

Dr. Eran Elinav, who led the study, said: "Our trial has shown that non-nutritive sweeteners may impair glucose responses by altering our microbiome."

Alamy

Dr Elinav added: "In my opinion as a physician, once it has been noted that non-nutritive sweeteners are not inert to the human body, the burden of proof of demonstrating or refuting their potential impacts on human health is at the responsibility of those promoting their use and we should not assume they are safe until proven otherwise. Until then, caution is advised."

Dr Elinav also said a long-term study would need to be conducted to determine whether sweeteners raise the risk of diabetes.

Advert

However, the immunologist explained that consuming sugars is a 'well-proven health risk for obesity, diabetes and their health implications'.

All four of the sweeteners used in the study have been approved for consumption by the FDA. However, stevia which is often found in diet soda drinks are not as closely monitored by the FDA because it is classed as 'generally recognised as safe' (GRAS).

According to the FDA, Food additives and GRAS both must be determined by scientists to meet 'the safety standard of reasonable certainty of no harm under the intended conditions of its use'.

Food additives must undergo a premarket reviews and be approved by the FDA. However, GRAs substances do not require premarket approval, which means that companies can decide whether or not to use them without being required to notify the FDA.

Earlier this year the World Health Organisation launched a public consultation to determine the health effects of sweeteners.

Advert

The meta-analysis of studies concluded: "Results from prospective cohort studies suggest the possibility of long-term harm in the form of increased risk of obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases and mortality. Further research is needed to determine whether the observed associations are genuine, or a result of study design."




Featured Image Credit: Dorling Kindersley ltd / Alamy Stock Photo Yon Marsh / Alamy Stock Photo

Topics: Science

Shiala Mahmood
Shiala Mahmood

Advert

Advert

Advert

Choose your content:

a minute ago
an hour ago
2 hours ago
16 hours ago
  • a minute ago

    Expert reveals how Iran could 'use secret agents to sabotage UK' following chilling threat

    Iran said it had launched some 100 missiles following Israel’s attack on its nuclear infrastructure which killed at least 224 people

    News
  • an hour ago

    Son of mum who died in horror skydiving accident recalls chilling joke she made before her death

    Mum-of-four Belinda Taylor and her instructor died in a skydiving incident on Friday (13 June)

    News
  • 2 hours ago

    Aviation expert says shocking new footage of Air India flight shows why it crashed with 242 people on board

    All but one of those on board were killed in the crash

    News
  • 16 hours ago

    World's 'first flying car' is going on sale much sooner than you think

    Flying cars are still something for the future, but apparently the rapidly approaching future

    News
  • Experts warn Brits about 20 passwords they should not be using in 2024
  • Doctors warn over viral 'mouth taping' sleeping hack that comes with serious risks
  • Experts warn that lunchtime favourite food is 'colossal' risk to health and could leave you seriously ill
  • NASA has live feed of 'God of Chaos' asteroid that experts warn could hit Earth very soon