Showing up to court can be one of the most daunting experiences someone can go through, even if it is as a witness.
However, in the age of social media, we've found ways to be more efficient, it seems, with filing through straightforward cases via Zoom.
It allows people to join the judge's virtual courtroom from a more laid-back environment, which is usually their home, although basic etiquette is expected, such as being fully clothed.
However, a Detroit police officer seems to have forgotten about this, and we're not talking about being dressed in a full work uniform either.
Advert
The officer, who identified himself as Matthew Jackson in the 36th District Court in the US state court, was virtually attending a hearing regarding a woman being accused of drag racing and disorderly conduct.
When Jackson appeared on the screen, he was wearing his Detroit Police Department uniform shirt and almost nothing else.
Luckily, his underwear was on, but there were no shorts or trousers present, with those looking at the screen pointing at his crotch area.
Judge Sean Perkins, clearly in shock, asked: "You got some pants on, officer?"
Advert
Jackson was clearly startled by this comment, answering that he didn't before moving the camera up to his upper half so that his lower body was no longer visible.
The hearing proceeded as normal, but the police told 7 News Detroit that they are investigating the incident and plan to remind all officers of proper etiquette and attire when they are required to appear in court.
As for why the judge appeared to be stunned, 36th District Court Chief Judge William McConico said: "I spoke with Judge Perkins, because I wanted to know, you know, what went through his mind with how he handled the case,
"He was stunned, obviously. He was shocked. Officer Jackson is a person he's known."
The judge emphasised that Jackson is a 'very professional police officer' who works with citizens, adding to the shock.
Advert
According to the court's website, the dress code in court is listed as: "Casual business attire is preferred. Prohibited attire includes shorts (cut-offs), skorts, sleeveless shirts (tank tops), hats/caps (except those worn for cultural or religious purposes) and other clothing which is not suitable in a Court or any other professional environment."
Attorney TaTaNisha Reed, who was at court proceedings for the defendant, said she was in disbelief, saying: "I was trying to figure it out. Like, am I seeing what I think I'm seeing? Especially with a police officer.
"So it was an interesting day to say the least."
Reed even tried to speak up in the hearing, attempting to draw the judge's attention, who may not have noticed the officer's appearance.
Advert
She claimed that she pointed out the camera needed to be 'altered', to which the judge reacted.
Detroit Police Chief Todd Bettison said in an official statement revealed to the publication: “The Detroit Police Department requires its officers to represent themselves in a dignified and professional manner while attending court proceedings.
"The involved officer's actions are not representative of the professionalism of this department and will be appropriately addressed to maintain the public confidence and efficient operation of this department.
"Our apologies are hereby extended to the judges and staff of the court, as well as anyone else who may have been in attendance during this incident," they concluded.
Joshua Nair