In your lifetime, you might remember calling someone a chicken, a pig or a rat.
For whatever reason, these animal names have taken on a human meaning that usually denotes something negative and we usually don't think too much about it.
But PETA wants this to stop because it's 'speciest'.
The animal rights organisation thinks it's unfair on the animals when their names are used as human behaviours.
Advert
In a Twitter thread, PETA said: "Words can create a more inclusive world, or perpetuate oppression. Calling someone an animal as an insult reinforces the myth that humans are superior to other animals & justified in violating them.
"Stand up for justice by rejecting supremacist language.
"Anti-animal slurs degrade animals by applying negative human traits to certain species. Perpetuating the idea that animals are sly, dirty, or heartless desensitises the public and normalises violence against other animals.
"Speciesist language isn't just harmful, but it is also inaccurate. Pigs, for instance, are intelligent, lead complex social lives, and show empathy for other pigs in distress. Snakes are clever, have family relationships, and prefer to associate with their relatives.
Advert
"PETA urges everyone who believes in equality and justice to take a look at their personal beliefs and the language they use, and break free of this outdated mindset that denigrates other animals.
Always be kind and consider not using insults at all."
In the picture provided by PETA, it highlighted that 'chicken' usually means someone is a coward, a pig is someone who repulsive, a rat equals a snitch, a snake is a jerk, and a sloth is lazy.
The post absolutely went viral on social media, with more than 19,000 people commenting on it and a further 21,000 people quote tweeting it.
Advert
There were many opponents to the idea, however some supported the notion that we shouldn't see animals as inferior.
One user wrote on Twitter: "My biggest pet peeve is when humans act as if other living beings are inferior to them. When really, humans are the only beings destroying the only environment that will support our existence, so we are likely not as intelligent as we would like to think."
Another added: "If humans didn't have such a superiority complex and was content to live with nature/animals instead of conquering/enslaving it, we would avoid most problems facing us today."
Not sure if it'll catch on any time soon though.
Featured Image Credit: PA
