
When it comes to going along to the cinema, it takes quite a lot to force people to walk out after they’ve paid for the film.
This is generally reserved for the most shocking movies around, such as the latest Jackass which has a stunt so disgusting that fans rushed out the cinema feeling sicking.
It is similarly rare for films to be outright banned from viewing, with Armie Hammer’s comeback movie being the most recent to achieve this after it was banned in Germany for its wildly offensive plot.
There is a film however that managed to achieve both however following the story of a queer man who becomes a serial killer.
Advert
Called Frisk, the 1995 movie stars Michael Gunther as Dennis, a young gay man who describes a series of grim murders to his best friend.
Based on a book published four years earlier, Frisk was outright banned in the UK in 1998 when it was judged ‘unsuitable for classification’, making it illegal to screen outside of very specific occasions where permission is sought from the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC).

The New York Times, writing in their 1996 review of the film, said: “This gruesome, boundary-pushing film, which opens today at the Quad Cinema, caused an uproar when it was shown last year at the San Francisco International Lesbian and Gay Film Festival.
“At a recent screening in Manhattan, its gory scenes of drugged-out punks being sodomized, strung up and murdered were enough to send a number of viewers scurrying to the exits.”
It features some pretty disturbing scenes, with one description of the film being “The Human Centipede, but gay.” As a queer person myself that does make me marginally more likely to watch it than The Human Centipede, but still unlikely to watch it at all.
Over the years though it has had a certain revival particularly due to the fact that, despite the film’s reputation, many of the worst things that Dennis did in the film are simply described, not actually shown.

Queerty, writing about how the film was ‘ahead of its time’, said: “Frisk is actually more graphic in the sex department [than in the violence], although even that is quite muted in comparison to what a casual scroll on X can bring these days.”
Queerty continued, saying: “There’s no erotic warmth to [director, Todd Verow’s] work. It’s lifeless erotica in every sense of the word, and that worried a community already beset by harmful equations of homosexuality with perversion in Hollywood (especially during the AIDS crisis).
“But now that there’s far more positive representation out there than before, it becomes easier to look back at Frisk all these years later as something daring and important rather than harmful and disgusting.”
Not quite everyone agrees though that it should now be looked back on as a ‘classic’, with one IMDb review saying: “First of all, if you are not a gay man then you might as well not bother with this film. Even if you are a gay man, it is still important to note that it is *supposed* to be a revolting and disgusting film.
“Worth seeing if you have nothing else to do and have a strong constitution and a sick mind. Otherwise, don't bother.”
Topics: TV and Film, Film, UK News